Back to Ideas

Women’s representation in clinical research
2026 Mar 3
Deconstructing Work
As a women-led company, equitable representation of women in healthcare research is especially important to us. As we strive to focus equally on women’s and men’s perspectives in our patient experience work, we find it useful to look back and see how women’s representation in research has changed over time. To the surprise of no one, women have not always been adequately represented in clinical research for conditions that impact all patients regardless of biological sex.
We can go back to the 1970s, for example, when the U.S. FDA had a policy which recommended excluding certain women (those who are pregnant and/or of child-bearing potential) from phase 1 drug clinical research. Researchers often applied the recommendation broadly, resulting in exclusion of women across any phase of interventional drug research. After rising concerns and protests related to the lack of clinical data in women’s health, a new law took effect in 1994, which required National Institutes of Health funded clinical research to include women and minorities as participants (with some exceptions).
Since then, progress has been made, but there still exists a large gap in understanding women’s health. Beyond sexual and reproductive health differences, evidence shows that women experience certain health conditions more frequently or differently than men — like osteoporosis, depression, autoimmune diseases, heart attacks, etc.
Everyone should have the choice and ability to weigh the potential benefits and risks of treatment, which necessitates that there is funding, priority, and clinical outcomes data specific to the experiences of women!
We hope to see more efforts being made to close the gap.

To learn more about efforts in this space in the last few years, check out:

Our other ideas worth exploring

Mailbag: social change and career choice

Mailbag: social change and career choice

2025 Dec 9 |

In general, the more a job is focused on contributing to society and community, the less it pays. It’s not an immutable law of physics, but wages in the charitable sector consistently lag the private sector, and typically there’s a trade-off between doing good (for the world) and doing well (for yourself, financially.)

read more